At the 2026 Oscars, climate change was conspicuously absent. It was in line with the general trend of avoiding anything that ...

The 2009 endangerment finding determined carbon dioxide and greenhouse gases threaten public health and welfare.

The suit challenged the Trump administration’s repeal of a scientific finding that had been the central basis for U.S. action to regulate greenhouse gas emissions and fight climate change.

The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency report found that the costs of inaction, including health effects and damaged infrastructure, far exceed the cost of climate adaptation measures.

The suit accuses the agency of illegally repealing the endangerment finding, the scientific assessment that required it to regulate greenhouse gases.

By 2050, scientists expect higher temperatures to make people less active. This could harm human health and the economy.

Increased use of ACs as the planet warms could create what researchers call a “feedback loop,” and higher emissions.

A global survey of 3,752 health professionals and researchers across 151 countries has identified climate change as a leading driver behind the escalation of infectious disease outbreaks, and ...

Faced with extreme drought, these wildflowers adapted. Scientists call it "evolutionary rescue" and say it's a hopeful sign ...

Minnesotans could pay upward of $20 billion every year in a few decades if the state doesn’t adapt to climate change, ...

EPA's repeal of the 2009 endangerment finding in February eliminated the foundation of much of U.S. climate policy.

A rule finalized by the EPA last month revoked the 2009 endangerment finding that determined carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases threaten public health and welfare.